| To: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:37:25 -0400 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxx>, Arthur Kepner <akepner@xxxxxxx>, "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <17001.4034.250460.397016@robur.slu.se> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <C925F8B43D79CC49ACD0601FB68FF50C03A633C7@orsmsx408> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504180943290.15052@linux.site> <1113855967.7436.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050419055535.GA12211@sgi.com> <m1hdhzyrdz.fsf@muc.de> <17001.4034.250460.397016@robur.slu.se> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2005-22-04 at 16:52 +0200, Robert Olsson wrote: > > BTW We talked with Intel folks about leaving irq disabled when reading > ISR and some status bit were. You caught me just before i said this ;-> Now - if those intel folks listened they would be making a killing with their NICs on Linux. They have a paper at OLS to talk about how they get influenced by the Linux people on how to improve their hardware - so maybe they took the advice;-> Jesse? Note, this would entirely solve what Andi and the SGI people are talking about. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.6.9 BUG in tcp_transmit_skb at net/ipv4/tcp_output.c, Chris Friesen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem, Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |