| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] NETLINK_UESTABLISHED notifier event |
| From: | Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:02:59 -0700 |
| Cc: | Mike Christie <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050409014447.GA22607@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| References: | <E1DJ0YI-0003PR-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <42540CF3.7070501@cs.wisc.edu> <20050406212906.GA24775@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112823442.16753.68.camel@beastie> <20050406220417.GA4443@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112826385.16753.99.camel@beastie> <20050407213231.GA28738@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112917001.3893.77.camel@beastie> <20050408113654.GA26095@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112974214.17165.8.camel@mylaptop> <20050409014447.GA22607@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 11:44 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:30:14AM -0700, Dmitry Yusupov wrote: > > > > This is ideally how it should be for sendmsg paths. socket applications > > like iscsi, nbd, etc will use it for TCP/IP type of socket. iscsi could > > re-use the same generic "emergency pool" code for netlink. > > In that case we'll wait for the resolution of the discussion on TCP > itself, OK? "emergency pool" is a big and generic feature, needs design and resolution. it could definitely wait. Do you have something against one liner patch for using sk->sk_allocation instead of hard-coded vm priority? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: atomic_dec_and_test for child dst needed in dst_destroy?, Christoph Lameter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fw: Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm2, Indrek Kruusa |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] NETLINK_UESTABLISHED notifier event, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] NETLINK_UESTABLISHED notifier event, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |