| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] RTNETLINK: Protocol family wildcard dumping for routing rules |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 07 Apr 2005 19:13:36 -0400 |
| Cc: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050407223847.GX26731@postel.suug.ch> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20050407213838.GW26731@postel.suug.ch> <E1DJfBR-0007Ym-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <20050407223847.GX26731@postel.suug.ch> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 18:38, Thomas Graf wrote:
> - [RTM_GETNEIGH - RTM_BASE] = { .dumpit = neigh_dump_info }
> + [RTM_GETNEIGH - RTM_BASE] = { .dumpit = neigh_dump_info },
> + [RTM_GETRULE - RTM_BASE] = { .dumpit = rtnetlink_dump_all },
> };
>
Shouldnt this just work (without this change) if you have
CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES?
If you want to be funky and have some default dumper always,
why not make the change to set dumpit to rtnetlink_dump_all in the code
when dumpit is found to be NULL as a last resort?
cheers,
jamal
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: atomic_dec_and_test for child dst needed in dst_destroy?, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 0/17] bonding: sysfs interface..., Radheka Godse |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] RTNETLINK: Protocol family wildcard dumping for routing rules, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] RTNETLINK: Protocol family wildcard dumping for routing rules, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |