[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire

To: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Apr 2005 16:42:48 -0500
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ipsec-tools-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <1112405144.1096.33.camel@jzny.localdomain> <>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 09:00, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hello!
> > a) -ERESTART is the correct signal to return
> Right behaviour is to behave like ARP. A few of packets are queued,
> no errors (until timeout), no blocking.

Herbert also mentions something along the same lines in his email. 
This would make a lot of sense!
Is the state machine going to look something along the same lines as
ARP? i.e incomplete->reachable etc?

What would be a good code to return when you queue the packet?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>