| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 30 Mar 2005 22:18:55 -0500 |
| Cc: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050331030145.GA27364@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <1111864971.1092.904.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050326194707.GA9872@gondor.apana.org.au> <1111867875.1089.915.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050327081848.GA13428@gondor.apana.org.au> <1111950449.1089.938.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050330004903.GA3399@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112237759.1092.35.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050331030036.GA27309@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050331030145.GA27364@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 22:01, Herbert Xu wrote: > Actually, could you rename it to km_state_cb? This information is > only used for communication with the the km and it should be marked > as such just like the other km_* identifiers. no problemo. [Should be able to post patch for both SP+SA with all these changes maybe sometime tommorow. Both Masahide and myself are doing some testing]. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] netif_rx: receive path optimization, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] PPP multilink fragmentation improvements, Paul Mackerras |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |