netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree

To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Mar 2005 06:55:29 -0500
Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@xxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050330010209.GN3086@postel.suug.ch>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <20050328123801.GY3086@postel.suug.ch> <1112014261.1089.1018.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050328125802.GZ3086@postel.suug.ch> <1112015725.1089.1045.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050328155523.GD3086@postel.suug.ch> <1112038128.1119.5.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050328195320.GE3086@postel.suug.ch> <20050328223310.GH3086@postel.suug.ch> <20050329011058.GJ3086@postel.suug.ch> <1112129516.1076.90.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050330010209.GN3086@postel.suug.ch>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 20:02, Thomas Graf wrote:

> So we always dump TCA_ACT_STATS when calling from tcf_exts_dump
> and add the backward compatibility TLVs in the second call
> comming from tcf_exts_dump_stats for actions that need it.
> 

Looks good from this side.

> Patches tested, works for me but might be worth for someone
> else to give it a try as well just to make sure. Meelis, could
> you give the 3 attched patches a try?
> 

Andy, can you just double check we dont have the problem you found
with stats?

cheers,
jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>