| To: | Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Patch] net: fix build break when CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not set |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 29 Mar 2005 16:26:00 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050329211741.GL22447@hmsendeavour.rdu.redhat.com> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20050329202506.GI22447@hmsendeavour.rdu.redhat.com> <1112130720.1076.112.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050329211741.GL22447@hmsendeavour.rdu.redhat.com> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 16:17, Neil Horman wrote: > No worries. What exactly is the point of contention on netdev? (I'm not > currently following that list). My patch seems to follow the common practice > for CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT, in that all references to the action member of the > appropriate struct are themselves ifdef-ed. We are trying to kill appearance of any #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT in the classifiers. The patch you sent is correct except it will introduce an ifdef that we are trying to kill. The current workaround is to turn on CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT in the kernel build. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Jörn Engel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Patch] net: fix build break when CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not set, Neil Horman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Patch] net: fix build break when CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not set, Neil Horman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Patch] net: fix build break when CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not set, Neil Horman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |