| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 28 Mar 2005 14:28:49 -0500 |
| Cc: | Meelis Roos <mroos@xxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050328155523.GD3086@postel.suug.ch> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503272249040.5086@math.ut.ee> <1111972035.1091.946.camel@jzny.localdomain> <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503281017060.21333@math.ut.ee> <1112012657.1089.1013.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050328123801.GY3086@postel.suug.ch> <1112014261.1089.1018.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050328125802.GZ3086@postel.suug.ch> <1112015725.1089.1045.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050328155523.GD3086@postel.suug.ch> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 10:55, Thomas Graf wrote: > * jamal <1112015725.1089.1045.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-28 08:15 > > On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 07:58, Thomas Graf wrote: > > But you cant completely do this for u32 tcf_exts_dump_stats. > > in the case of ACTION compiled in but someone using old API. > > The code that Meelis just mention that compiler complained about. > > There was no problem with u32 and tcf_exts_dump - with that you can hide > > all #ifedfs. > > I think we can avoid your fixes. You are still missing the question;-> You can do this for every classifier but u32. Or is it me who is missing something? cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: IMQ again WAS(Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Merge p80211 to ieee80211 subsystem, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |