netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: IMQ again WAS(Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement

from [jamal] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IMQ again WAS(Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Mar 2005 08:57:11 -0500
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Remus <rmocius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@xxxxxxxxx>, Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>, syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx, Damion de Soto <damion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1112017546.1089.1048.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <1107123123.8021.80.camel@jzny.localdomain> <423F41AD.3010902@dsl.pipex.com> <1111444869.1072.51.camel@jzny.localdomain> <423F71C2.8040802@dsl.pipex.com> <1111462263.1109.6.camel@jzny.localdomain> <42408998.5000202@dsl.pipex.com> <1111550254.1089.21.camel@jzny.localdomain> <4241C478.5030309@dsl.pipex.com> <1111607112.1072.48.camel@jzny.localdomain> <4241D764.2030306@dsl.pipex.com> <1111612042.1072.53.camel@jzny.localdomain> <4241F1D2.9050202@dsl.pipex.com> <4241F7F0.2010403@dsl.pipex.com> <1111625608.1037.16.camel@jzny.localdomain> <424212F7.10106@dsl.pipex.com> <1111663947.1037.24.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1111665450.1037.27.camel@jzny.localdomain> <4242DFB5.9040802@dsl.pipex.com> <1111749220.1092.457.camel@jzny.localdomain> <42446DB2.9070809@dsl.pipex.com> <1111781443.1092.631.camel@jzny.localdomain> <4244802C.7020202@dsl.pipex.com> <1111788760.1090.712.camel@jzny.localdomain> <42470AF9.8050402@dsl.pipex.com> <424808F7.50101@dsl.pipex.com> <1112017546.1089.1048.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 08:45, jamal wrote:

> Dont see why this shouldnt work. You are saying it works with
> non-aliased interface addreses?
> 

Tested - worked fine here. I know those error messages suck and we can
do better in the future. Double check your kernel has police compiled
in.

cheers,
jamal
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: IMQ again WAS(Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, Andy Furniss
Next by Date:  Re: IMQ again WAS(Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal
Previous by Thread:  Re: IMQ again WAS(Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal
Next by Thread:  Re: IMQ again WAS(Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, Andy Furniss
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]