netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Mar 2005 15:05:05 -0500
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050326194006.GA9737@gondor.apana.org.au>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <1111864971.1092.904.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050326194006.GA9737@gondor.apana.org.au>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 14:40, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:22:51PM -0500, jamal wrote:
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/xfrm.h  2005/03/26 18:30:26     1.1
> > +++ b/include/linux/xfrm.h  2005/03/26 18:47:48
> > @@ -254,5 +254,8 @@
> >  
> >  #define XFRMGRP_ACQUIRE            1
> >  #define XFRMGRP_EXPIRE             2
> > +#define XFRMGRP_POLEXPIRE  4
> 
> Is the intention that you'll be sending policy expire messages to
> POLEXPIRE only?

Right. Unless you think this will break existing apps?


> If so please add a new group for SA expire messages only so that
> XFRMGRP_EXPIRE continues to get all expire messages for compatibility.
> 

Ok, i should have read ahead ;->
Maybe i should leave EXPIRE alone?

cheers,
jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>