| To: | Pablo Neira <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: iptables versioning feature causes ABI breakage |
| From: | Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 25 Mar 2005 17:24:12 -0500 |
| Cc: | Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <42432E51.1080309@eurodev.net> |
| Organization: | ZNYX Networks |
| References: | <1111666300.1037.40.camel@jzny.localdomain> <42432E51.1080309@eurodev.net> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 16:17, Pablo Neira wrote: > Jamal, > > Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Could whoever that made the versioning changes in iptables please > > contact me? > > I was also involved in that change together with Rusty around january. > It's a new infrastructure to extend matches/targets without breaking > backward compatibility with previous releases of target/matches/iptables. > I think in the future this will go fine; all actions have a version field as well that is set to 0 at the moment. > I must confess that I didn't have a look at your ipt_action stuff before > , now I did. As Patrick pointed out, we'll keep in mind your ipt thing > in future. > > Your patch for tc to fix the problem looks fine. BTW, you can now use > extended MARK features like --and-mark and --or-mark ;-> > cool. Would you like to pay for your sins;-> by looking at my code to see it doesnt break or miss things? cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: PHY Abstraction Layer II, Andy Fleming |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: iptables versioning feature causes ABI breakage, Pablo Neira |
| Next by Thread: | Re: iptables versioning feature causes ABI breakage, Pablo Neira |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |