netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement

To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Mar 2005 14:22:02 -0500
Cc: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Remus <rmocius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@xxxxxxxxx>, Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>, syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx, Damion de Soto <damion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1111777717.1090.576.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <1107123123.8021.80.camel@jzny.localdomain> <025501c52552$2dbf87c0$6e69690a@RIMAS> <1110453757.1108.87.camel@jzny.localdomain> <423B7BCB.10400@dsl.pipex.com> <1111410890.1092.195.camel@jzny.localdomain> <423F41AD.3010902@dsl.pipex.com> <1111444869.1072.51.camel@jzny.localdomain> <423F71C2.8040802@dsl.pipex.com> <1111462263.1109.6.camel@jzny.localdomain> <42408998.5000202@dsl.pipex.com> <1111550254.1089.21.camel@jzny.localdomain> <4241C478.5030309@dsl.pipex.com> <1111607112.1072.48.camel@jzny.localdomain> <4241D764.2030306@dsl.pipex.com> <1111612042.1072.53.camel@jzny.localdomain> <4241F1D2.9050202@dsl.pipex.com> <4241F7F0.2010403@dsl.pipex.com> <1111625608.1037.16.camel@jzny.localdomain> <424212F7.10106@dsl.pipex.com> <1111663947.1037.24.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1111665450.1037.27.camel@jzny.localdomain> <4242DFB5.9040802@dsl.pipex.com> <1111749220.1092.457.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1111754346.1092.480.camel@jzny.localdomain> <42444A14.3090809@trash.net> <1111775660.1092.571.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1111777717.1090.576.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 14:08, jamal wrote:

> Its narrowed down to be user space problem. Investigating ..

sigh. I just wasted 3 hours on this.

Seems someone (the patch did not come from me) made a change to mirred
code in user space to ensure only a single socket was being used. This
will never work if you have a dump inside a dump. To resolve this in the
patch that i sent to Stephen for mirred had two separate sockets - one
for each dump. I wish i had remembered this a few hours back.

Anyways i will stick with patch i sent Andy.

cheers,
jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>