| To: | Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 23 Mar 2005 09:12:48 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1111586750.1075.0.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <E1DE44X-0001QM-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <1111581618.1088.72.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050323125516.GP3086@postel.suug.ch> <1111583497.1089.92.camel@jzny.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503231438290.10048@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> <1111586750.1075.0.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Actually its well documented even on the man pages - so should have not even have bothered discussing it;-> Should get new brand of coffee. Apologies for unecessarily abused electrons - which means dont respond ;-> cheers, jamal On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 09:05, jamal wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 08:40, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > >I have seen people put little comments of "kfree will work if you > > >pass it NULL" - are you saying such assumptions exist all over > > >net/sched? > > > > Not only net/sched. The C standard requires that free(NULL) works. > > Thanks for clarifying this. > > cheers, > jamal > > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c?, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RFC: workaround quality bug in zd1201 hardware, Colin Leroy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c?, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | RE: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c?, Yichen Xie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |