| To: | Steve Iribarne <steve.iribarne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 09 Mar 2005 19:11:30 -0500 |
| Cc: | Henrik Nordstrom <hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Mares <mj@xxxxxx>, Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@xxxxxxx>, Eran Mann <emann@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <B8561865DB141248943E2376D0E85215FFE2AF@DHOST001-17.DEX001.intermedia.net> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <B8561865DB141248943E2376D0E85215FFE2AF@DHOST001-17.DEX001.intermedia.net> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 16:57, Steve Iribarne wrote: > There it is. I'm not going to spend anymore time on this, and neither > should you. Like I said, I've been doing this for a darn long time, and > I have, as yet, to see anyone who can make this problem just work. > Other than the way I did it. (I along with many others) > Lets end this thread - we are clearly never gonna get to a consensus. Whoever asked the question on how to expose loopback got their answer and you say you are not pushing the patch - so we are all one big happy family. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Jason Lunz |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Steve Iribarne |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Boian Bonev |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |