| To: | Kaigai Kohei <kaigai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages |
| From: | Guillaume Thouvenin <guillaume.thouvenin@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:53:56 +0100 |
| Cc: | Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, jlan@xxxxxxx, LSE-Tech <lse-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, elsa-devel <elsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <42247051.7070303@ak.jp.nec.com> |
| References: | <4221E548.4000008@ak.jp.nec.com> <20050227140355.GA23055@logos.cnet> <42227AEA.6050002@ak.jp.nec.com> <1109575236.8549.14.camel@frecb000711.frec.bull.fr> <20050227233943.6cb89226.akpm@osdl.org> <1109592658.2188.924.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050228132051.GO31837@postel.suug.ch> <1109598010.2188.994.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050228135307.GP31837@postel.suug.ch> <1109599803.2188.1014.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050228142551.GQ31837@postel.suug.ch> <1109604693.1072.8.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050228191759.6f7b656e@zanzibar.2ka.mipt.ru> <1109665299.8594.55.camel@frecb000711.frec.bull.fr> <42247051.7070303@ak.jp.nec.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 22:38 +0900, Kaigai Kohei wrote:
> > I tested without user space listeners and the cost is negligible. I will
> > test with a user space listeners and see the results. I'm going to run
> > the test this week after improving the mechanism that switch on/off the
> > sending of the message.
>
> I'm also trying to mesure the process-creation/destruction performance on
> following three environment.
> Archtechture: i686 / Distribution: Fedora Core 3
> * Kernel Preemption is DISABLE
> * SMP kernel but UP-machine / Not Hyper Threading
> [1] 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 normal
> [2] 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 with PAGG based Process Accounting Module
> [3] 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 with fork-connector notification (it's enabled)
>
> When 367th-fork() was called after fork-connector notification, kernel was
> locked up.
> (User-Space-Listener has been also run until 366th-fork() notification was
> received)
I don't see this limit on my computer. I'm currently running the lmbench
with a new fork connector patch (one that enable/disable fork connector)
on an SMP computer. I will send results and the new patch tomorrow
because the test takes a while...
I'm using a small patch provided by Evgeniy and not included in the
2.6.11-rc4-mm1 tree.
Best regards,
Guillaume
--- orig/connector.c
+++ mod/connector.c
@@ -168,12 +168,11 @@
group = NETLINK_CB((skb)).groups;
msg = (struct cn_msg *)NLMSG_DATA(nlh);
- if (msg->len != nlh->nlmsg_len - sizeof(*msg) - sizeof(*nlh)) {
+ if (NLMSG_SPACE(msg->len + sizeof(*msg)) != nlh->nlmsg_len) {
printk(KERN_ERR "skb does not have enough length: "
- "requested msg->len=%u[%u],
nlh->nlmsg_len=%u[%u], skb->len=%u[must be %u].\n",
- msg->len, NLMSG_SPACE(msg->len),
- nlh->nlmsg_len, nlh->nlmsg_len - sizeof(*nlh),
- skb->len, msg->len + sizeof(*msg));
+ "requested msg->len=%u[%u], nlh->nlmsg_len=%u,
skb->len=%u.\n",
+ msg->len, NLMSG_SPACE(msg->len + sizeof(*msg)),
+ nlh->nlmsg_len, skb->len);
kfree_skb(skb);
return -EINVAL;
}
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted, Quantum Scientific |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | e1000 problem with NAPI?, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages, Kaigai Kohei |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages, Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |