El lun, 31-01-2005 a las 14:42 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx escribió:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:50:25 +0100, Adrian Bunk said:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:15:43AM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
>
> > > Note that obsd_rand.c started off life as a BSD-licensed file - I was told
> > > that was a show-stopper when I submitted basically the same patch a while
> > > back.
> > >...
> >
> > At least the three clause BSD license is GPL compatible.
>
> The copy of obsd_rand.c I have hass the problematic 4-clause version. It
> looks
> to me like we'd need to get Michael Shalayeff, Theodore T'so, and Niels Provos
> to all agree to re-license under the 3-clause variant. Using Arjan's code is
> most likely the better approach...
Then we would in that way ;)
Arjan, I will give it a further look, is there anything you want to
comment about it before I start?
I will re-code it to put the helper functions in random.c.
Thanks in advance,
Cheers.
--
Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <lorenzo@xxxxxxx>
[1024D/6F2B2DEC] & [2048g/9AE91A22][http://tuxedo-es.org]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
|