On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 22:33, jamal wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 21:18, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Ok, how about we do this for 2.6.11 before it goes out and
> > do something more sophisticated (if necessary) later.
> >
> > The BUG() we're trying to catch in the ->hard_start_xmit()
> > routines is the illegal state:
> >
> > driver_tx_queue_empty() && !netif_queue_stopped(dev)
> >
>
> In the e1000 theres a lot more code in hard_start_xmit() that could
> be possibly entered before you hit the xmit lock. So thats another
> potential issue.
> The tg3 you refer to in your email doesnt seem to be as bad and
> i am actually wondering why what you just posted is _the fix_ as is.
meant is not _the fix_
too many typos - off to bed.
cheers,
jamal
|