netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput

To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 18 Jan 2005 09:43:51 -0500
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Werner Almesberger <werner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050118143658.GA11474@xi.wantstofly.org>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <20050117152312.GC26856@postel.suug.ch> <1105976711.1078.1.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050117160539.GD26856@postel.suug.ch> <1105979807.1078.16.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050117165626.GE26856@postel.suug.ch> <1106002197.1046.19.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050118134406.GR26856@postel.suug.ch> <1106058592.1035.95.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050118143658.GA11474@xi.wantstofly.org>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 09:36, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:29:52AM -0500, jamal wrote:

> If you do this, please consider using Juniper config syntax instead
> of doing it the Cisco/quagga way.
> 

Juniper is XML driven config files?
[I am hoping Thomas would do it, btw;-> only if we strongly disagree
then i will be tempted to provide an alternative]. 

btw, libio uses libevent; i recall you said you had some alternative to
it.

cheers,
jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>