| To: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 16 Jan 2005 15:05:06 -0500 |
| Cc: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, shollenbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050116190227.GC21870@xi.wantstofly.org> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20050112222437.GC14280@xi.wantstofly.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501130944270.19573@netcore.fi> <20050113092351.GA23170@xi.wantstofly.org> <1105897020.1091.736.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050116190227.GC21870@xi.wantstofly.org> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 14:02, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > Apparently they mis-read the RFC and write the etherip header as 0x0300 > instead of 0x3000 (they have the version nibble in the wrong place.) This > would likely prevent interoperability. Thinking about it a bit - you should be able to break yours to do 0x0300 to test with them ;-> cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling), jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling), Lennert Buytenhek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |