| To: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch: tc action cleanups |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 16 Jan 2005 13:41:53 -0500 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <41EAB296.3090504@trash.net> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <1105899636.1090.794.camel@jzny.localdomain> <41EAB296.3090504@trash.net> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 13:29, Patrick McHardy wrote: > jamal wrote: > > >Heres one i think you didnt resurect Patrick. If ok, Dave please apply. > >Other than that i cant seem to find anything at issue with the core > >(havent looked at the individual actions other than to follow changed > >code from the core). > > > bindcnt/refcnt changes are protected by the rtnl, no need for extra locking. > The lock only needs to protect data shared with the "act" function. Very clever ;-> maybe add a comment then to that effect in your next batch? Dave ignore that patch. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | E-Gold Service Pack, E-gold |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] meta ematch, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch: tc action cleanups, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | patch: namsiz, Jamal Hadi Salim |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |