| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] meta ematch |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 16 Jan 2005 10:37:54 -0500 |
| Cc: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050116150914.GU26856@postel.suug.ch> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20050108145457.GZ26856@postel.suug.ch> <1105363582.1041.162.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050110211747.GA26856@postel.suug.ch> <1105394738.1085.63.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050113174111.GP26856@postel.suug.ch> <41E6C3E5.2020908@trash.net> <20050113192047.GQ26856@postel.suug.ch> <41E71CC4.3020102@trash.net> <20050114151407.GR26856@postel.suug.ch> <1105887519.1097.597.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050116150914.GU26856@postel.suug.ch> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 10:09, Thomas Graf wrote: > The lvalue will be TCF_META_ID_INDEV and your rvalue will be > TCF_META_TYPE_VAR with "eth0" as payload(TCF_EM_META_RVALUE). > TCF_EM_META_LVALUE will be unused in this case. ok - i get it. So the rvalue is basically just the data that needs to be compared against. rvalue confused me a little. If you had called it meta_data i would have got it right away. But now that you explain it, makes sense. I am not sure iam following yet: So in the case of indev, you would need to - get indev ifindex from skb - get indev name from skb - compare the two?? Actually it may be a little overkill to have those two as separate entities with their own headers etc, no? Why not just store it in the same fashion you transported it from/to user space? I will start looking at the code cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] meta ematch, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] meta ematch, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] meta ematch, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] meta ematch, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |