| To: | Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 05 Jan 2005 08:45:18 -0500 |
| Cc: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <87pt0kc87m.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20050103125635.GB26856@postel.suug.ch> <87pt0kc87m.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 08:32, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Thomas Graf: > > > I attached 4 patches of a first ematch implementation. Comments > > and suggestions very much appreciated. Compiles but untested. > > This might infringe US patent 5,793,954 and the patents that reference > it. 8-( hehe. We can sleep better knowing we dont run Linux using C++ ;-> That patents reads like it owns every classifier ever written in C++ that runs on a processor. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier, Florian Weimer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier, Florian Weimer |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] Check for SOL_SOCKET in compat_sys_getsockopt, Olaf Kirch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |