| To: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 30 Dec 2004 23:45:36 -0500 |
| Cc: | Maillist netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <41D4286B.1060106@trash.net> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <41D3785F.3040909@trash.net> <1104382562.1048.39.camel@jzny.localdomain> <41D3F5EC.9050808@trash.net> <41D4286B.1060106@trash.net> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 11:10, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Thinking about it, I think its better to reorganize the > patches by subject. While doing this I'm going to add > back the useful printks in the init paths as DPRINTKs. > I'm going to post the entire reorganized batch next week > when I return home, working with bitkeeper on my crappy > notebook is just to painful :) [I dont use bitkeeper for religious reasons (i hope i am not offending anyone)]. Ok, sounds like a good plan (gives me more time to work with the driver stuff which is getting out of control ;->): I think the patches may have goten a little messy. Maybe the order should be: you, Thomas with what he has now then myself with eaction and Thomas with extended matches (I dont think the order of the last two matters). I will just code against whatever latest release is and migrate later when all the otehr patches are in. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/9] PKT_SCHED: u32: make use of tcf_exts API, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Issue on packets sending through ip_route_output_key() to xfrm_lookup() in native IPsec, Park Lee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes, Patrick McHardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |