| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 19 Dec 2004 14:31:15 -0500 |
| Cc: | Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, openib-general@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041217214432.07b7b21e.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <52llbwoaej.fsf@topspin.com> <20041217214432.07b7b21e.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 00:44, David S. Miller wrote: > Perhaps one way to fix this is to add a pointer to a spinlock to > the netdev struct, and have hold that the upper level grab that > when NETIF_F_LLTX when doing queue state checks. Actually, that > could end up being racy too. How about releasing the qlock only when the LLTX transmit lock is grabbed? That should bring it to par with what it was originally. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |