| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 15 Dec 2004 09:03:12 -0500 |
| Cc: | Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041215112741.GJ8493@postel.suug.ch> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20041215012754.GH12937@stusta.de> <20041215112741.GJ8493@postel.suug.ch> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
This is fine. The new architecture doesnt require classifiers explicitly call those function. Rest also looks fine to me. Good effort Adrian. cheers, jamal On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 06:27, Thomas Graf wrote: > * Adrian Bunk <20041215012754.GH12937@xxxxxxxxx> 2004-12-15 02:27 > > > -extern int tcf_act_police_locate(struct rtattr *rta, struct rtattr > > *est,struct tc_action *,int , int ); > > -extern int tcf_act_police_dump(struct sk_buff *, struct tc_action *, int, > > int); > > -extern int tcf_act_police(struct sk_buff **skb, struct tc_action *a); > > This looks like a police compat API for action policers but I think it's > fine, Jamal? > > The other changes all make sense to me. > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.6 patch] net/netlink/af_netlink.c: possible cleanups, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |