| To: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9 |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 08 Dec 2004 14:44:30 -0500 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tgraf@xxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, tomc@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <41B73263.4040706@trash.net> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <1102380430.6103.6.camel@buffy> <20041206224441.628e7885.akpm@osdl.org> <1102422544.1088.98.camel@jzny.localdomain> <41B5E188.5050800@trash.net> <20041207170748.GF1371@postel.suug.ch> <41B5E722.2080600@trash.net> <20041207213053.6bb602c1.davem@davemloft.net> <1102507470.1051.27.camel@jzny.localdomain> <41B73263.4040706@trash.net> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 11:57, Patrick McHardy wrote: > jamal wrote: > > >I can almost guarantee that one or more of those tests i outlined would > >fail. So i would suggest a revert until the testing has been done. > > > Please be more specific than an "almost guarantee" that > "one or more tests" may fail when asking to revert a patch > that fixes an easily triggerable crash. For example, point > to the code that makes you think it might fail. I hope this is clear after you read the last email exchange i had with Thomas and that you are not intentionaly trying to be annoying. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: inter-packet gap in pktgen, Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: status of via velocity in 2.6.9, Lenar LÃhmus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |