| To: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9 |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 07 Dec 2004 23:27:25 -0500 |
| Cc: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Cataldo <tomc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <41B5E722.2080600@trash.net> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <1102380430.6103.6.camel@buffy> <20041206224441.628e7885.akpm@osdl.org> <1102422544.1088.98.camel@jzny.localdomain> <41B5E188.5050800@trash.net> <20041207170748.GF1371@postel.suug.ch> <41B5E722.2080600@trash.net> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 12:23, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Either one is fine with me, although I would prefer to see > the number of ifdefs in this area going down, not up :) You guys pick one or other or a mix. I run 4 base testcases for the policer typically: 1) Old kernel, uptodate TC - MUST pass 2) old kernel, old tc (trivial - expected to pass). 3) New Kernel, uptodate TC - MUST pass 4) New Kernel, uptodate TC - MUST pass (although trivial) Try both setting, dumping then deleting policies. If these tests pass, please push patch to Dave. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | RE: how to tune a pair of e1000 cards on intel e7501-based system?, Brandeburg, Jesse |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9, Jamal Hadi Salim |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |