| To: | Peter Kjellstroem <cap@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: e1000>5.2.30 unstable with InterruptThrottleRate=0 |
| From: | Scott Feldman <sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 05 Dec 2004 16:30:33 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx, john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0412052230410.13794-100000@papput.nsc.liu.se> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0412052230410.13794-100000@papput.nsc.liu.se> |
| Reply-to: | sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 13:39, Peter Kjellstroem wrote: > this is the original fix and triggers for both e1000_82547 (your 547EI > right?) and e1000_82547_rev_2 (my 547GI). If your NIC can't stand the fix > and mine needs it isn't the obvious solution the following? Ganesh/John, what do you think? Is there a clear dividing line between 82547EI and 82547GI wrt this issue? If so, could Peter's patch go in? -scott |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: r8169.c, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit), Scott Feldman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: e1000>5.2.30 unstable with InterruptThrottleRate=0, Peter Kjellstroem |
| Next by Thread: | Re: e1000>5.2.30 unstable with InterruptThrottleRate=0, Venkatesan, Ganesh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |