| To: | sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit |
| From: | Marco Mellia <mellia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 02 Dec 2004 18:31:30 +0100 |
| Cc: | birke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mellia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, e1000-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jorge Manuel Finochietto <jorge.finochietto@xxxxxxxxx>, Giulio Galante <galante@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1101863399.4663.54.camel@sfeldma-mobl.dsl-verizon.net> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <1101467291.24742.70.camel@mellia.lipar.polito.it> <41A73826.3000109@draigBrady.com> <16807.20052.569125.686158@robur.slu.se> <1101484740.24742.213.camel@mellia.lipar.polito.it> <41A76085.7000105@draigBrady.com> <1101499285.1079.45.camel@jzny.localdomain> <16811.8052.678955.795327@robur.slu.se> <1101821501.1043.43.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041130134600.GA31515@xi.wantstofly.org> <1101824754.1044.126.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041201001107.GE4203@xi.wantstofly.org> <1101863399.4663.54.camel@sfeldma-mobl.dsl-verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | mellia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 02:09, Scott Feldman wrote:
> Hey, turns out, I know some e1000 tricks that might help get the kpps
> numbers up.
>
> My problem is I only have a P4 desktop system with a 82544 nic running
> at PCI 32/33Mhz, so I can't play with the big boys. But, attached is a
> rework of the Tx path to eliminate 1) Tx interrupts, and 2) Tx
> descriptor write-backs. For me, I see a nice jump in kpps, but I'd like
> others to try with their setups. We should be able to get to wire speed
> with 60-byte packets.
>
Here are the numbers in our setup:
vanilla kernel [2.4.20 + packetgen + driver e1000 5.4.11]
4096 Descr => 356 Mbps (60 bytes long frames)
=> 941Mbps (1500 bytes lonf frames)
256 Descr => 354 Mbps (60 bytes long frames)
=> 941Mbps (1500 bytes lonf frames)
Patched driver [2.4.20 + packetgen + driver e1000 5.4.11 patched]
4096 Descr => 357 Mbps (60 bytes long frames)
=> 941Mbps (1500 bytes lonf frames)
I guess that was _not_ the bottleneck sigh... at least with a PCI-X bus.
Again, latency issue of the DMA transfer from RAM to NIC?
--
Ciao, /\/\/\rco
+-----------------------------------+
| Marco Mellia - Assistant Professor|
| Tel: 39-011-2276-608 |
| Tel: 39-011-564-4173 |
| Cel: 39-340-9674888 | /"\ .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
| Politecnico di Torino | \ / . ASCII Ribbon Campaign .
| Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24 | X .- NO HTML/RTF in e-mail .
| Torino - 10129 - Italy | / \ .- NO Word docs in e-mail.
| http://www1.tlc.polito.it/mellia | .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
+-----------------------------------+
The box said "Requires Windows 95 or Better." So I installed Linux.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Multicast filtering for tun.c [PATCH], Shaun Jackman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] b44: allow ethtool get_settings when down, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit, Marco Mellia |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |