| To: | KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] IPSEC failover and replay detection sequence numbers |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 29 Oct 2004 08:58:41 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ipsec-tools-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vpn-failover@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1099045435.2888.47.camel@nienna.balabit> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <1099045435.2888.47.camel@nienna.balabit> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Krisztian, To take a rough estimate of 5K users, how often do you think these replay messages will be generated? Is there a (clever) way to avoid transporting them and still achieve an accurate failover? cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 7/6] cls_fw: CONFIG_NET_CLS_IND is not dependant on CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH netdev-2.6 7/10] ixgb: Replace kmalloc with vmalloc to allocate driver local data structures, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [RFC] IPSEC failover and replay detection sequence numbers, KOVACS Krisztian |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] IPSEC failover and replay detection sequence numbers, KOVACS Krisztian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |