netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Make netif_rx_ni preempt-safe

To: Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make netif_rx_ni preempt-safe
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:53:21 -0400
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx, irda-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Network Development <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Alain Schroeder <alain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200410202214.31791.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
References: <1098230132.23628.28.camel@krustophenia.net> <200410201811.44419.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <1098290858.1429.70.camel@krustophenia.net> <200410202214.31791.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 15:14, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 October 2004 19:47, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 11:11, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > > 0x57 == 87 bytes is too big for inline.
> > 
> > Ugh.  So the only fix is not to inline it?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> You can make it conditionally inline/non-inline
> depending on SMP/preempt if you feel masochistic today :),
> but last time I asked davem thought that it is over the top.

I agree, not worth the trouble.  This would actually depend only on
PREEMPT and not SMP.

OK, third try.

Signed-Off-By: Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx>

--- include/linux/netdevice.h~  2004-10-20 15:51:00.000000000 -0400
+++ include/linux/netdevice.h   2004-10-20 15:51:54.000000000 -0400
@@ -694,11 +694,14 @@
 /* Post buffer to the network code from _non interrupt_ context.
  * see net/core/dev.c for netif_rx description.
  */
-static inline int netif_rx_ni(struct sk_buff *skb)
+static int netif_rx_ni(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-       int err = netif_rx(skb);
+       int err;
+       preempt_disable();
+       err = netif_rx(skb);
        if (softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()))
                do_softirq();
+       preempt_enable();
        return err;
 }
 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>