netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 22 Sep 2004 08:08:40 -0400
Cc: Pablo Neira <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040922045239.GA19573@gondor.apana.org.au>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <414DF11C.1080505@eurodev.net> <20040919215915.GB9573@gondor.apana.org.au> <1095633569.1047.107.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040919231734.GA10124@gondor.apana.org.au> <1095647944.1046.206.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040920025802.GA11567@gondor.apana.org.au> <1095683660.1047.254.camel@jzny.localdomain> <414F1E12.6010808@eurodev.net> <20040922000503.GA13218@gondor.apana.org.au> <4150E7E5.2000001@eurodev.net> <20040922045239.GA19573@gondor.apana.org.au>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 00:52, Herbert Xu wrote: 
> Congestion control similar to the way dumping works may work for you.

Note the initial goal was to have dump work for large tables and a
simple get for a basic table row.
Since netlink is being used for a lot of things now, it may be time to
obsolete those assumptions. 
Note also, theres a lot of wastage of that scarce sock buffer via page
sized skbs - its not as trivial to fix, but would go some way to improve
overrunning of the socket.

cheers,
jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>