| To: | Steve Blake <slblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 21 Sep 2004 23:10:38 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1095809938.2340.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20040918203319.24004d6e.davem@davemloft.net> <1095645106.1048.190.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040919195351.0b3560e6.davem@davemloft.net> <1095686672.1049.301.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040920121123.70baf895.davem@davemloft.net> <20040921034212.GA28462@gondor.apana.org.au> <20040920231805.3f18479c.davem@davemloft.net> <20040921090423.GE8058@wotan.suse.de> <20040921093252.GA32545@gondor.apana.org.au> <1095764621.1049.14.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1095809938.2340.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 19:38, Steven Blake wrote: > RFC 1812 was written before TOS routes were pulled out of OSPFv2 (due to > too fee independent implementations). No one implements FIB lookup as > described in RFC 1812 in the core. What people do implement is PBR, as > well as DSCP-based nexthop selection for MPLS DIFF-TE (RFC 3564). What about edge? The PBR nh selection is a post routing policy though. Do you see it valuable to have DSCP replace TOS for lookup? cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, Steven Blake |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, Steven Blake |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |