| To: | Eric Mudama <edmudama@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: The ultimate TOE design |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:15:28 +0100 |
| Cc: | David Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <311601c90409162346184649eb@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <4148991B.9050200@pobox.com> <OF8783A4F6.D566336C-ON88256F10.006E51CE-88256F10.006EDA93@us.ibm.com> <311601c90409162346184649eb@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Gwe, 2004-09-17 at 07:46, Eric Mudama wrote: > On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:11:04 -0600, David Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Why don't we off-load filesystems to disks instead? > > Disks have had file systems on them since close to the beginning... This is essentially the path Lustre is taking. Although it seems you don't want to have a "full" file system on the disk since you lose to much flexibility, instead you want the ability to allocate by handle giving hints about locality and use. People have also tried full file system offload - intel for example prototyped an I2O file system class, and adaptec clearly were trying this out on aacraid development from looking at the public headers. Alan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 8/8 2.5] e1000 - White space changes, driver version number update and others, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Crypto tests via tcrypt.o modules failes, Zilvinas Valinskas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: The ultimate TOE design, Eric Mudama |
| Next by Thread: | Re: The ultimate TOE design, Valdis . Kletnieks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |