| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Routing] Performance Comparison between 2.6 and 2.4 kernel |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 16 Sep 2004 07:30:58 -0400 |
| Cc: | Song Wang <wsonguci@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040915110858.125cea28.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <1094868693.1041.86.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040915180603.98079.qmail@web40007.mail.yahoo.com> <20040915110858.125cea28.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 14:08, David S. Miller wrote: > On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:06:03 -0700 (PDT) > Song Wang <wsonguci@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The mips CPU on the board is MIPS32 compatible. > > I don't think it's NAPI based. > > NAPI is an attribute of the network adapter, not > the cpu. > > Although I would very much anticipate this being > a MIPS or network adapter specific problem since > on x86 routing is pretty fast in 2.6.x Note, I could hit 4-500Kpps on a bcom sb1250 800Mhz; trying to simulate Andis gettimeofday changes (which are in 2.6 since i havent seen a 2.6 port for that board ) gives another 100Kpps. Theres still room for improvement just havent had time. You are right though it could be a 2.6.x arch specific issue. Bacchus? cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RTNETLINK] Tunnel config via netlink (Was Re: Convert RTM_* to enum), Pekka Savola |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: The ultimate TOE design, Neil Horman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Routing] Performance Comparison between 2.6 and 2.4 kernel, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Routing] Performance Comparison between 2.6 and 2.4 kernel, Song Wang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |