netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] BSD Jail LSM (2/3)

To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BSD Jail LSM (2/3)
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:56:39 +0100
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, akpm@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040912233342.GA12097@escher.cs.wm.edu>
References: <1094847705.2188.94.camel@serge.austin.ibm.com> <1094847787.2188.101.camel@serge.austin.ibm.com> <1094844708.18107.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040912233342.GA12097@escher.cs.wm.edu>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Llu, 2004-09-13 at 00:33, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Right now one must choose between either an ipv4 or ipv6 interface.
> Is typical ipv6 usage such that it would be preferable to be able to
> specify one of each?  

Its normal to have both yes.

A more interesting question is whether all of the "which socket for
which use" stuff could be addressed by netfilter chains run at
bind/connect time ?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>