| To: | "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] watch64: generic variable monitoring system |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 04 Sep 2004 09:19:59 -0400 |
| Cc: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200409031744.32970.jeffpc@optonline.net> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <200409031307.01240.jeffpc@optonline.net> <200409031319.24863.jeffpc@optonline.net> <20040903121657.355a6a8b@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <200409031744.32970.jeffpc@optonline.net> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
I have a feeling this was discussed somewhere(other than netdev) and i missed it. Why isnt this watch64 being done in user space? cheers, jamal On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 17:44, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Friday 03 September 2004 15:16, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > - Code doesn't match the kernel style (read Documentation/CodingStyle) > > Sorry about the white space, KMail apparently likes to butcher the text. > These > are the same patches with the little cleanup update. > > Jeff. > > - -- > Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. > - Albert Einstein > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) > > iD4DBQFBOOW+wFP0+seVj/4RAgSiAJj54qcqdEx66lbMW9ik0XviupTNAKC82an1 > R0pGX0pTBZ78NWrZpxJm+w== > =EesC > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [BK PATCHES] 2.6.x net driver fixes, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Extend lock less TX to real devices, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] watch64: generic variable monitoring system, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] watch64: generic variable monitoring system, Jeff Sipek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |