| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 30 Aug 2004 22:37:03 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040830191716.0d002f91.davem@redhat.com> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <1093799632.1073.410.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040830144033.2265a6e6.davem@redhat.com> <1093904088.1043.12.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040830154430.769d1d59.davem@redhat.com> <1093906592.1037.32.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040830160052.548c4846.davem@redhat.com> <1093916592.1037.51.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040830191716.0d002f91.davem@redhat.com> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 22:17, David S. Miller wrote: > On 30 Aug 2004 21:43:13 -0400 > jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Not sure i parsed that. You mean the tc_stats in user space will be the new > > one. > > Yes, that's his idea. This way on older kernel the "new" statistics > just show up as zero. thmart. Lets go with this then. Steve, do you wanna take it from here with the iproute2 patch i sent or you want me to generate a new one? Now how do we tell all other people who have written netlink apps to beware? cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] MASQUERADE / policy routing ("Route send us somewhere else"), Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |