| To: | johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [1/2] CARP implementation. HA master's failover. |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 15 Jul 2004 10:44:14 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-failover@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1089898595.6114.866.camel@uganda> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <1089898303.6114.859.camel@uganda> <1089898595.6114.866.camel@uganda> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Evgeniy, Why do you need to put this stuff in the kernel? This should be implemented just the same way as VRRP was - in user space. BTW, is there a spec for this protocol or its one of those things where you have to follow Yodas advice? cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [1/2] CARP implementation. HA master's failover., Evgeniy Polyakov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fragment ID wrap workaround (read-only, untested)., David Stevens |
| Previous by Thread: | [1/2] CARP implementation. HA master's failover., Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [1/2] CARP implementation. HA master's failover., Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |