| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 08 Jul 2004 09:36:14 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Catalin BOIE <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040707142216.7c9763c3@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <20040701113312.43cfe6c5@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040702134437.5891e998@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <1088824432.1043.271.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040707111055.32ebb25b@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <1089226667.1027.411.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040707135831.4c98dd51@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <1089234699.1026.448.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040707142216.7c9763c3@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
I have taken out lartc from the CC; it keeps bouncing emails back to me. On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 17:22, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Actually, the problem only occurs if burst is set large (like 2mb). > I think it gets stuck waiting for that much data. Sounds like a bug. If you have the exact setup description i can chase it. What about CBQ, HTB, H-FSC? The other way to do it is actually put a router next to a localy generated traffic. I have used this many times in the past (a sample is at: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2884.txt section 4.1) cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: asymmetry with MSG_DONTWAIT in sendmsg() and recvmsg(), Michael T Kerrisk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Broadcom 4400 driver bm44, Pekka Pietikainen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |