| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sungem - ifconfig eth0 mtu 1300 -> oops |
| From: | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:03:34 -0500 |
| Cc: | Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel@xxxxxx, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <40D84A9B.8010503@pobox.com> |
| References: | <20040621141144.119be627.davem@redhat.com> <40D847E3.2080109@nortelnetworks.com> <40D84A9B.8010503@pobox.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 10:04, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Chris Friesen wrote: > > Just a quick question. Does the sungem chip support jumbo frames? I'd > > like to use MTU of 9000 to make large local transfers more efficient, > > but it didn't seem to work last time I checked. > > > Are you 100% certain you configured the other side to support jumbo? > > Jumbo frames are non-standard, and sometimes require configuring MTU on > the switch or remote network card (if directly connected). Well, it's not enabled in the driver I think, or at least it wasn't last time I looked. Dave told me the chip fifo's are too small to do anything useful with jumbo frames. Ben. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [LARTC] [ANNOUNCE] sch_ooo - Out-of-order packet queue discipline, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] skfddi - cleanup local and dead functions, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sungem - ifconfig eth0 mtu 1300 -> oops, Chris Friesen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sungem - ifconfig eth0 mtu 1300 -> oops, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |