| To: | Aidas Kasparas <a.kasparas@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.5, IPSec, NAT funnies |
| From: | Dax Kelson <dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:45:47 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <408F5555.3080303@gmc.lt> |
| References: | <1083133394.2817.40.camel@mentor.gurulabs.com> <408F5555.3080303@gmc.lt> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 00:55, Aidas Kasparas wrote: > Kernel bug. IPSec changes ip headers, but fails to say about this to > conntrack. More information > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=215980 > Patch at > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi/ipsec_conntrack.diff?bug=215980&msg=3&att=1 A 7 month old kernel bug with a patch. Is there any reason why this hasn't been rolled into the Linus tree yet? Is the something objectionable with the patch? Dax Kelson Guru Labs |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH r8169] ethtool support and sane speed selection/detection, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] netlink functions that can be static (trivial), Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.5, IPSec, NAT funnies, Aidas Kasparas |
| Next by Thread: | spin_lock_bh() called in irq handler, Paul Mackerras |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |