| To: | Max Krasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: tun device - bug or feature? WAS(Re: IMQ / new Dummy device post. |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 26 Apr 2004 22:22:26 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1083007898.7788.276.camel@localhost> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <wazza.87ad18jbdl.fsf@message.id> <1082427350.1034.70.camel@jzny.localdomain> <wazza.87fzayw1fy.fsf@message.id> <wazza.87fzaxmr6x.fsf@message.id> <wazza.87hdvddqxq.fsf@message.id> <1082639764.1059.81.camel@jzny.localdomain> <87oepjx65r.87n053x65r@87llknx65r.message.id> <1082719745.1057.27.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1082816083.1054.32.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1083007898.7788.276.camel@localhost> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:31, Max Krasnyansky wrote: > Well TUN does not have any hw headers so there is nothing to pull :). didnt notice the dev->hard_header_len being 0 before ;-> In that case it makes sense to have nothing to pull. Theres about 5 devices like that. I need to rethink a little on behavior of mirred with devices that have no hardware headers. I may speacial case them. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Regarding NAPI performance, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Update FarSync WAN driver in 2.4.25, Kevin Curtis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: tun device - bug or feature? WAS(Re: IMQ / new Dummy device post., Max Krasnyansky |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] IPv6 IPsec AH typo, Masahide NAKAMURA |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |