| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6: QoS scheduling not working with IP-over-IP |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 12 Feb 2004 00:43:59 -0500 |
| Cc: | qnex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1076563502.1031.85.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402101324350.810-100000@atlantis.knm.org.pl> <20040211200549.736fa8b3.davem@redhat.com> <1076561489.1032.65.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1076561998.1035.72.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1076562282.1033.76.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040211211536.23e97997.davem@redhat.com> <1076563502.1031.85.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 00:25, jamal wrote: > > OK, however, old behavior would be like setting tx_queue_len to '1'. > > Do we wish to preserve this? I think i misunderstood you - you are saying maybe it was not a bug after all in pfifo, right? i.e the off by one is ok. I suppose you could look at it that way; i am just baffled that tunnels worked fine though with that size of default. Note the poster didnt seem to change the tx_queue_len cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] IPV6: kill in6_u.u6_addrX, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6: QoS scheduling not working with IP-over-IP, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6: QoS scheduling not working with IP-over-IP, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6: QoS scheduling not working with IP-over-IP, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |