| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTNETLINK] Provide real oif |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 02 Dec 2003 07:31:57 -0500 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031202110224.GA25957@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <20031202110224.GA25957@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 06:02, Herbert Xu wrote: > Hi Dave: > > This patch adds a new attribute RTA_PREFOIF to the RTNETLINK interface > so that we can send the real oif to user space. Hmm, would RTA_REALOIF > be a better name? It really should be called RTA_OIF but that's already > taken. > > Currently if there are two entries in the routing cache that only differ > by the value of oif then they will appear identical to user space. The > only way to tell them apart would be to export the value of oif from > the kernel. > Can you provide a real example (output of route display in user space) where this would be valuable? whats wrong with the combo of RTA_OIF and RTA_SRC? cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.0-test11: dst_cache_overflow causing unresponsive box, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RTNETLINK] Provide real oif, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | [RTNETLINK] Provide real oif, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RTNETLINK] Provide real oif, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |