On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 01:59, Brad House wrote:
> any reason why it's not against the v1.6 ?
I think you misunderstood. If I intepret the list correctly, the 1.6
changes are in that list (as "your changes (week-end)".)
> the current driver is missing support for the
> 8110S chip (or at least it doesn't seem to work at all),
> so you're cutting out all the chips on the mobos out there.
> Haven't looked to see if it's just a PCI ID or other functionality,
> but since the V1.2 is from realtek that's in the official
> kernel, it would make sense to use the 1.6 patch....
IIRC, the realtek one got cleaned up a great deal before entering
mainline, both bug-fixes and coding style cleanups. Your patch may
revert a lot of that work (I havn't looked at it closely.) Also the
changelog differs for the 1.2 entry between the two versions, indicating
just this.
Lets take one step at a time ;-)
> > It is against the original r8169. Once finished, it should look like:
> > - first cut at dma api conversion (today)
> > - remaining bits of dma api conversion (tomorrow)
> > - rx_copybreak (tomorrow)
> > - your changes (week-end)
> > - big-endian fixes (week-end)
> >
> > Each part divided in reasonably small patches to ease the test/review
> > process.
--
Mvh,
André Tomt
andre@xxxxxxxx
|