| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] nfmark modify extension to classifiers |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 12 Oct 2003 16:00:58 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexey <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031007012858.GF11250@rei.reeler.org> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <20031006002619.GC11250@rei.reeler.org> <1065479986.1102.3.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20031007012858.GF11250@rei.reeler.org> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 21:28, Thomas Graf wrote: > Hello > > > This is a bad idea. > > Please consider using the tc action extensions. > > You mean TC_POLICE_NFMARK? This was actually my initial idea > but I wanted to avoid a dependency mess. > I meant this: http://www.cyberus.ca/~hadi/patches/action/README so you can do: tc filter add dev lo parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip src \ 127.0.0.1/32 flowid 1:1 .... action metaset classid 1:14 nfmark 0x10 ... cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), Randy.Dunlap |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), Randy.Dunlap |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] nfmark modify extension to classifiers, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] nfmark modify extension to classifiers, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |