| To: | Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6 |
| From: | David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:46:08 +0100 |
| Cc: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, lksctp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200309291438.h8TEcVtH021550@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> |
| References: | <20030928225941.GW15338@fs.tum.de> <20030928231842.GE1039@conectiva.com.br> <20030928232403.GX15338@fs.tum.de> <20030928233909.GG1039@conectiva.com.br> <20030929001439.GY15338@fs.tum.de> <20030929003229.GM1039@conectiva.com.br> <1064826174.29569.13.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <20030929141548.GS1039@conectiva.com.br> <200309291438.h8TEcVtH021550@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:38 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > No, this is the behavior we want, and we can write Kconfig help entries that > explain it. > > Anybody want to do a sanity check against CONFIG_IP6_NF_IPTABLES - that > looks like another gotcha if it isn't implemented properly (it may be, I just > haven't > actually looked it over)? In 2.7 we really should just stop the CONFIG_xxx_MODULE definitions being available during builds of the static kernel. -- dwmw2 |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, Valdis . Kletnieks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH}[bonding] Restore compatibilty with old ifenslave, Shmulik Hen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, Valdis . Kletnieks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |