| To: | Carlos Velasco <carlosev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 17 Aug 2003 16:28:12 +0100 |
| Cc: | Lamont Granquist <lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, bloemsaa@xxxxxxxxx, Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, layes@xxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200308171555280781.0067FB36@192.168.128.16> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030728222606.21100A-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com> <20030728213933.F81299@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> <200308171509570955.003E4FEC@192.168.128.16> <200308171516090038.0043F977@192.168.128.16> <1061127715.21885.35.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> <200308171555280781.0067FB36@192.168.128.16> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sul, 2003-08-17 at 14:55, Carlos Velasco wrote: > >> According to RFC 1027: > >> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1027.txt > > > >Proxy ARP only. > > So, if you have a router performing Proxy ARP... you don't need to > reply to the "bad" Linux ARP Request, right? Linux doesn't issue "bad" requests. Linux will reply when it is asked for an address that it owns, as per RFC826, unless you chose to change the behaviour with things like arpfilter. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: linux-2.4.21 and IPv6: problem solved, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, Bas Bloemsaat |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, Carlos Velasco |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, Bas Bloemsaat |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |