| To: | alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: route-cache status? |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 16 Jul 2003 02:19:13 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307071255480.4114-100000@paix.pilosoft.com> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307071255480.4114-100000@paix.pilosoft.com> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Not sure if anybody responded to you; if you are on 2.4.x those patches seem to have made it into the latest pre 2.4.22 off kernel.org. Just grab those. cheers, jamal On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 13:03, alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hello, > > i've been following discussions a few weeks ago regarding developments of > route cache, and am trying to develop conclusion of the current best code > base. > > >From list, it seems that 2.4.20 is still better than 2.5.70+davem patches > or 2.4.21. > > Am I correct? Are there any newer patches available? > > -alex > > > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] e1000 TSO parameter, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patches] invalid nh.raw use after free, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | route-cache status?, alex |
| Next by Thread: | disablenetwork() syscall?, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |